سؤال : نرى بعض الكتاب إذا أراد الثناء على تفسير وصفه بأوصاف منها أنه يعرض عن الاسرائيليات، فهل هذا صحيح على إطلاقه؟ ـ
Question: We have seen some books which, when they want to praise a book of tafsir, they will describe it with certain characteristics such as that it rejects the use of Israa’eeliyyaat narrations. Is this always a valid point?
الجواب : هذا الاطلاق لا يصح؛ فإن بعض الصحابة رووا الإسرائليات، و لم يعب عليهم ذلك. ـ
Response: It is not correct to treat this as a valid rule in every instance, for some of the Sahabah relayed Israa’eeliyyaat narration without being criticized for doing so.
فإن قيل : أخرج البخاري تحت رقم (2685) عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عَبَّاسٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمَا، قَالَ: ” يَا مَعْشَرَ المُسْلِمِينَ، كَيْفَ تَسْأَلُونَ أَهْلَ الكِتَابِ، وَكِتَابُكُمُ الَّذِي أُنْزِلَ عَلَى نَبِيِّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَحْدَثُ الأَخْبَارِ بِاللَّهِ، تَقْرَءُونَهُ لَمْ يُشَبْ، وَقَدْ حَدَّثَكُمُ اللَّهُ أَنَّ أَهْلَ الكِتَابِ بَدَّلُوا مَا كَتَبَ اللَّهُ وَغَيَّرُوا بِأَيْدِيهِمُ الكِتَابَ، فَقَالُوا: هُوَ مِنْ عِنْدِ اللَّهِ لِيَشْتَرُوا بِهِ ثَمَنًا قَلِيلًا، أَفَلاَ يَنْهَاكُمْ مَا جَاءَكُمْ مِنَ العِلْمِ عَنْ مُسَاءَلَتِهِمْ، وَلاَ وَاللَّهِ مَا رَأَيْنَا مِنْهُمْ رَجُلًا قَطُّ يَسْأَلُكُمْ عَنِ الَّذِي أُنْزِلَ عَلَيْكُمْ “. فهذا ابن عباس رضي الله عنه ينكر سؤال أهل الكتاب ؟ ـ
Now, what if one were to say: al-Bukhari brings the following hadith narration #2685 on the authority of ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbaas who said:
O Muslims, how can you ask the Ahl al-Kitab when your Book which Allah revealed to His Prophet is the most recent information about Allah? You recite it and it has not been distorted, but Allah has told you that the Ahl al-Kitab have altered what Allah wrote and changed the scripture with their own hands, saying, “This is from Allah” in order to exchange it for a small price. Doesn’t the knowledge that has come prevent you from asking them? But, and I swear by Allah, we have never seen a single one of them asking you about what has been sent to you!
So here we have ibn ‘Abbaas criticizing asking the Ahl al-Kitab, isn’t it?
فالجواب : إنما أنكر ابن عباس رضي الله عنه من يترك ما في القرآن ويسأل أهل الكتاب عما في كتابهم، أمّا من طلب من كتبهم أموراً تتعلق بمبهمات القرآن، أو بقصص القرآن فهذا ليس محل الذم والنهي . ـ
We could respond by saying: Ibn ‘Abbaas was only criticizing those who abandoned what is in the Qur’an and instead asked the Ahl al-Kitab about what was in their scriptures. As for those who are looking for some further details in their scriptures about things or stories that were only mentioned in general terms in the Qur’an, then that does not merit criticism or prohibition.
وقد جمع بعض أهل العلم بين ما ورد عن الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم في الرواية عن أهل الكتاب ، بأنها على ثلاث جالات : أن تكون موافقة لما في شرعنا .فهنا الحجة ما في شرعنا… وقد جاء في الحديث: “حدثوا عن بني إسرائيل ولاحرج”. أن تكون مخالفة لما في شرعنا ، فهذا لا ينبغي اعتماده ولا الرجوع إليه، ويذم ناقله من المفسرين بدون تنبيه عليه. وفيه حديث: “امتهوكون فيها يا ابن الخطاب”. أن لا تكون موافقة و لا مخالفة، وفي هذه الحال جاء حديث: “إذا حدثكم أهل الكتاب فلا تصدقوهم ولا تكذبوهم”. ـ
Some of the scholars have reconciled the different reports from the Prophet regarding relaying information from the Ahl al-Kitab by saying that such information can be divided into three types:
1) Something that is in line with our religious guidance. In this case it would be considered a proof of what our religious guidance teaches.
A hadith mentions, “Narrate from Banu Israa’eel, there is no harm in that.”
2) Something that is in opposition to our religious guidance. This ought not to be taken as reliable nor referred back to, and any mufassir who mentioned such a thing in his tafsir without pointing out that it opposes our religious guidance would deserve to be criticized.
There is a hadith related to this: “Have you become confused about this, O ibn al-Khattaab?!”
3) Something that is neither in line with nor in conflict with our religious guidance.
Regarding this situation, there is the hadith: “If the Ahl al-Kitab tell you something, neither declare them to be right nor declare them to be wrong.”
فأنت ترى أن الرواية عن أهل الكتاب جائزة في حالين و لا تجوز في حال واحدة فقط. ومن هذا تعلم ما في ذكر أن المفسر يعرض عن الإسرائيليات من نظر! ـ
So you can see that relaying information from the Ahl al-Kitab is permitted in two of these situations and only disallowed in one. From this, you can know that what was said about the mufassir who turned away from using Israa’eeliyyaat narrations is not a black and white situation.
وبالله التوفيق . 22 شوال 1441هـ ـ
And Allah is the grantor of success.
Shawwaal 22, 1441